Computer Science and the Humanities

In the last three years, since the beginning of my PhD, I have been reading a lot of stuff about Digital Humanities, a lot of definitions, a lot of introductions (in more than one language), and I have been discussing several times with many people, but I am still not satisfied, I am not convinced that a useful and satisfactory guide that explains in full the connection and the relationship between computer science and humanities has been as yet produced. I am not, obviously, saying that I will be the one who will write such a thing, I am still trying to find my way into it, but I am willing to try an experiment and see what comes out of it.

To explain what I mean I will quote the ending of a previous post I wrote some times ago, in which I was addressing a similar question:

DH people routinely ask themselves if we should eventually drop the word digital, because what we are actually doing is the very same thing that we always did as humanists. I don’t disagree with this position. But, looking at the Italian label, informatica umanistica [humanities computing], I think that, given the interdisciplinary nature of informatica [computing] itself, we could also reverse the claim, dropping the adjective umanistica [humanities].
The question I am now asking to myself (and to anyone else who dare to answer, of course. Comments are welcome) is:

Should we perhaps say that, as digital humanists, what we are actually doing (in fact, what we have been doing for a while already) is pure a simple informatica [computing, or computer science], with no humanistic or scientific label attached? would this be too daring, too far-fetched?

Following this train of thoughts (actually, if you haven’t read that post, you should read it now. Hopefully it will put this one in perspective), what I am proposing is to start from Computer Science as it is and see to what extent it can be considered humanistic. In practice, what I will do in the following weeks is to read Brookshear’s Computer Science: an overview (Pearson 2011) and comment, chapter by chapter, on this blog, highlighting in what sense humanities are involved, putting together a list of topics and a reading list (using what I read in these three years) with material that could complement what is said in the book, summarising, rephrasing and rewriting the topics from the humanistic point of view, etc.

As I said, it’s an experiment, but as far as I know (actually I am quite sure about this) such an approach has never been tried before, so I am very curious where it could lead.

[UPDATE: I just want to add that this experiment is not necessarily aimed at saying something new about anything,  it will mainly be a way to put order in my brain. Sometimes you need to do that if you want to move forward.]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search OpenEdition Search

You will be redirected to OpenEdition Search